Group Administrators Announce New Rule: Members Must State Their Location to Stay Active
In a recent announcement that has caught the attention of many online communities, a group administrator made it clear that members who fail to participate actively will be removed. The message was direct and unambiguous: “We are going to remove people that are not active in this group. So only state your state to keep you active.”
This decision highlights a common challenge faced by many social and professional groups on digital platforms—ensuring that members are not only present but also engaged. With thousands of groups created daily for networking, learning, entertainment, or social bonding, administrators often struggle with the issue of inactive members. While numbers may look impressive on paper, inactive users dilute the purpose and energy of a group.
By requiring members to state their state of residence, the administrators aim to achieve two key objectives:
- Encouraging Participation – Even a simple response such as sharing one’s state helps keep the conversation going and gives members a sense of belonging. This approach pushes silent participants to at least check in, proving that they are still interested.
- Building a Stronger Community Identity – Asking members to share their location fosters connection. When members know others from their own state or nearby regions, it opens opportunities for collaboration, friendships, and even offline interactions. It transforms the group from being just another faceless online space into a more relatable community.
The announcement also carries an important message: membership is not about numbers but about value. A smaller, more engaged group often proves more effective than a large, silent one. Inactive members can weaken discussions, discourage active participants, and create a false sense of size and importance.
However, the decision has sparked some debate. Critics argue that forcing members to respond to maintain their status may feel restrictive, especially for those who prefer to observe rather than actively contribute. Others believe that true engagement should go beyond simply stating one’s state—it should involve meaningful discussions, sharing knowledge, or supporting other members.
Despite these concerns, the administrator’s move reflects an increasing trend in digital community management: prioritizing engagement over mere numbers. Whether in social, professional, or educational spaces, groups thrive when members are active, responsive, and connected.
As online communities continue to grow, the success of this strategy will depend on how it is implemented. If it inspires members to engage more deeply, then the group will emerge stronger and more united. But if it becomes just a checkbox exercise, it may fail to achieve lasting change.
In the end, the administrator’s message serves as a timely reminder: being part of a group is not just about joining—it’s about contributing, connecting, and keeping